The majority position was? however? Census surveys in favour of this addition? considering that it was necessary for the information to be able to be mobilised at a detailed level? i.e. through the census? and insisting on Census surveys the statistical nature and purpose of the latter. are large-scale? can only be used for the purposes of establishing statistics and studies? and in no way to base individual decisions.
The identity first Last names of the persons surveyed is not retained? only their characteristics declared through their census responses (sex? date of birth? diploma? profession? etc.) are retained.
Thus? the origins of the
The data collected is protecte by luxembourg phone number library technical provisions (a highly secure information system)? legal provisions (1951 law on the obligation? coordination and secrecy in matters of statistics? Data Protection Act of 1978) and all those involved in the census? from the census agent to the agent in charge of dissemination? are subject to professional what is needed to expand inbound demand in the future? secrecy and liable to sanction in the event of non-compliance. persons surveye? like the other data collecte through the questionnaire? are not retaine by name and the census data do not allow them to be followe by name over several generations.
Another dimension of the problem was to be analyze
How would these questions be receive? Questions awb directory on disability or parents’ place of birth can be considere more personal? more subjective or more “difficult”? in the sense that people do not necessarily have the answer? than the questions asked so far in the census.
However? the questionnaire test showed that this feeling or these difficulties remaine rare: only 4 to 5% of respondents found these questions too personal and when respondents said they were bothere by the question on parents’ place of birth? it was mainly because they did not know where their parent(s) was/were born.