At the same time! practice shows that problems can arise due to insufficiently clear criteria for assessing the quality of expert opinions. In a number of cases! incorrectly drafted opinions have caused additional litigation! Foreign experience which delayed the implementation of decisions.
In many European countries! the functions of experts are more regulated than in Ukraine. For example! in Foreign experience Germany! experts involved in enforcement proceedings are required to adhere to strict quality regulations crypto-assets standards. They undergo regular certification! and their conclusions are checked by independent commissions. In cases where errors are detected! the expert may lose his license to practice.
France has gone even further by introducing a single electronic platform for data exchange
Foreign experience between experts! judges! and enforcement officers. This approach not only increases the transparency of the process! but also significantly reduces the time it takes to enforce decisions.
Practical challenges in Ukraine
In Ukraine! one of the main challenges remains the lack of is the internet of things always a good technology? clear mechanisms Foreign experience for controlling the quality of experts’ work. For example! in practice! the assessment of the value of a debtor’s property may differ significantly depending on the methodology used by the valuation entity. This creates risks of disputes between the parties.
In addition! during the execution of court decisions concerning property disputes! situations often arise when debtors challenge the actions of executors based on shortcomings in the work of experts. Thus! the unprofessionalism or negligence of one of the participants in the process can cause significant delays in the execution of decisions.
Legal grounds for engaging an expert
The procedural codes of Ukraine provide for the possibility of involving an expert in enforcement ao lists proceedings. This is regulated by the provisions of the Law of Ukraine “On Enforcement Proceedings”! which states that the executor has the right to initiate the involvement of specialists if it is impossible to carry out enforcement actions without their participation.