You can see for yourself that the general approach to the properriterion is much stricter than in Russia even after the reform. This is again related to risk coverage. The richer you are, the less risk you have of losing all your sweden telegram data wealth as a result of an unsuccessful deal with complex instruments. The less money you have, the higher this risk is. We have had precedents where people lost all six million, for which they became qualified, and there are many such examples. And this, of course, greatly influences the position and decisions of the regulator regarding the size of this criterion. But we are moving forward progressively.
— Has the situation changed in any way since
the active discussion of the qualification reform began? Are there more or fewer complaints? Have the risks
— The situation over the past year has become, as it seems to us, calmer, because the mass risks that greatly affected the mood and behavior of investors were realized earlier. This is primarily the blocking of rights to own foreign securities in the foreign accounting infrastructure. It was after this that we decided to limit access to foreign securities for “non-quals”, leaving them only with securities from the EAEU countries and international financial organizations. Moreover, in both cases – those recorded in the EAEU infrastructure. This was an absolutely forced measure, because an investor cannot independently calculate the risks of blocking in the accounting infrastructure.
— Do you assume that non-qualified investors
will not have access to foreign securities, with the exception of the gap between universities and digital marketing the EAEU, in the future? Or is this possible if the geopolitical situation changes?
— Anything is possible, we do not want to artificially limit the investor’s right to decide for himself what to invest in. This is his choice and his responsibility. But we cannot ignore the significant risks of a new type.
— How to find this balance? On the one hand, do not limit america email excessively, and on the other hand, calculate possible risks.