Own part to play in AI ethics. In general, businesses pursue more financially oriented goals. Which means that they are more prone to use solutions that save them money. AI is perfect for that, as AI-powered software can work with huge chunks of data. Process them and offer results in the form of suggestions. Strategies to follow and even deciding things on their own.
All of that saves a ton of time
Money for businesses, as humans c level contact list doing exactly the same would take considerable more resources to offer the same kind of results. Yet, just considering the AI issue from the cost-cutting aspect is ethically troubling. On the one hand, there’s the limitation of AI software to consider the implications of its own suggestions and strategies.
What’s more, today’s context
Companies holding all the power of ai shouldn’t be seen as a replacement for human autonomy AI ethics. Since they are the ones developing the impressive number of AI-powered apps, businesses are the ones deciding their ethical boundaries. And even the rising trend of ethics boards within those companies (from big tech firms like Google and Facebook to brand new startups) can’t seem to address that issue, as the power is still gripped firmly by private hands that think on stakeholders first and the society in second place.
That turns the third interested
Party in this issue into an insanely sault data important actor of the whole equation. Society (understood as the end users of those applications as well as the public institutions) has to take an interest in this development and actively participate in it. Since the vast majority of everyday people will “suffer” from the advancement of AI, its voice doesn’t just have to be heard but also taken into account going into the future of artificial intelligence.