but nevertheless, we are making this platform. The platform itself will be good for metaprogramming and database-orient useful, because it will allow us to exchange information about risks, etc. with banks. We are going to test it on 30 banks in December. And the banks themselves want this system to exist, and, most importantly, the clients want it, small and mium businesses, we discuss it with them.
I still can’t understand the objective reasons
System raises questions. I don’t see them. It seems like this is a project from which everyone benefits, compliance costs simply fall. There was a lot of justifi criticism from small and mium businesses that the procures for monitoring illegal transactions and money laundering can sometimes put small businesses on the brink of survival. The problem for small and mium businesses is this: the bank must study it, its profile, see whether there are risks or not, but for a bank to mess around with a small client so much is a very big expense. It will sort things out with a large client, but here it is easier for it not to accept the client for service, to put it on some kind of what is a cadence flow? stop list. We would like to protect small businesses and remove costs from banks.
Hope that the law will be pass
the system will work and it will be easier for everyone.
— And for small businesses, there won’t be a vicious circle here: they come america email to one bank, get reject, get into the system with a black mark, and automatically no other bank will service them?